On Wednesday, June 23, the US House of Representatives Judiciary Committee approved five antitrust bills, three of them aimed at Big Tech, and took up the last and most aggressive proposed legislation on Thursday. This last is a bill that could require platforms to sell off lines of business.
The debate was extended and began midmorning on Wednesday and stretched into early on Thursday, lawmakers voted to approve a measure that would prohibit platforms like Amazon from disadvantaging rivals who use their platform.
According to Reuters, it also voted to accept a measure that would require big tech companies contemplating mergers to show that they are legal, rather than requiring antitrust enforcers to prove that they are not.
Jerrold Nadler, Committee Chairman said the bills were needed to protect an open internet that has “delivered enormous benefits to Americans and our economy.”
“A small set of online platforms have become gatekeepers for much of the digital marketplace,” he said. “These dominant platforms can have the incentive and ability to abuse their market power to pick winners and losers among the firms that rely on their platforms to reach users and customers.”
When the committee resumes work, it will take up what some call the “break ’em up” bill. This would require a platform, again like Amazon, to sell any business that competes with other businesses using its platform.
There has been vociferous opposition to that bill and others, including from the US Chamber of Commerce, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google.
The committee also approved a bill that would increase the budgets of the agencies enforcing antitrust law. A companion measure has already passed the Senate.
The panel additionally approved measures to require platforms to allow users to transfer their data elsewhere and to ensure that antitrust cases brought by state attorneys general remain in the court they select.
Featured News
X May Be Excluded from EU’s Strict Tech Rules, Sources Suggest
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
G7 Targets Competitive Imbalances in Semiconductor Industry
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
DOJ Weighs In on MediaTek-Realtek Antitrust Battle
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Novartis Cleared of Wrongdoing in Swiss Competition Commission Investigation
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Rio Tinto to Acquire U.S.-Based Arcadium Lithium in $6.7 Billion Deal
Oct 9, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh