It took no time for news of a $160 billion merger between Pfizer and Allergan to spur objections from several presidential candidates.
The deal will allow Pfizer to move its domicile from the US to Ireland, where its tax bill will fall drastically. The politicians see this expatriation as a slap in the face.
The companies seem to be pretty confident of this. They agreed to pay only a tiny breakup fee in the event that a change in laws causes them to part ways.
The termination fee for pulling out of the deal for other reasons would stand between $3bn and $3.5bn, in line with other deals of this size, but the merger agreement allows the companies to walk away for a fraction of that amount “due to an adverse change in the law”.
The Financial Times said there was nervousness that the largest ever “inversion” deal could fall prey to political interference, because it would allow Pfizer to avoid at least $21bn in future US tax bills by moving the combined group to Ireland, where Allergan is based.
A Pfizer spokesman said the company believes that tax reform is important to US competitiveness, a view that CEO Ian Read has repeated since long before the Allergan deal.
Full content: The Financial Times
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
FTC and State Attorneys General Sue John Deere Over Repair Restrictions in Antitrust Case
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Enbridge Wins Legal Battle Against Ducere’s Antitrust Allegations
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
GOP Pushes for Antitrust Authority Consolidation Under DOJ in New Legislation
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Canadian Government Approves Bunge-Viterra Merger with Conditions
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
SEC Sues Elon Musk Over Delayed Disclosure of Twitter Stock Ownership
Jan 15, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand