A renowned antitrust plaintiffs’ lawyers based in San Francisco has been hit with a rare order after challenging the 2011 Southwest Airlines/AirTran Holdings merger. Joseph Alioto and the Alioto Law Firm have been ordered by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals to pay $67,495 to the defendants of the case that challenged the merger. While motions to sanction lawyers are often filed, they are rarely granted; the court granted the motion after the filing claimed Alioto’s litigation was “unreasonable and vexatious.” According to a professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, granting the motion “almost never happens.” Additionally, the case has stirred up debate on the merit of private antitrust suits that challenge mergers, questioning whether the ruling could potentially discourage other lawyers from bringing such cases. The amount Alioto and the firm were ordered to pay equates the defendants’ law fees.
Featured News
South Korean Law Firm Lee & Ko Adds Antitrust Partner Min-Ho Lee
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Trump Nominates Business Executive and GOP Donor to FTC
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
OSTP Official Lays Out Details on White House AI Initiatives At House Hearing
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk Accused of Blocking Access to Lower-Cost Weight-Loss Drugs
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Visa, Mastercard and Revolut Fail to Block UK Fee Cap Proposal
Jan 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi