A renowned antitrust plaintiffs’ lawyers based in San Francisco has been hit with a rare order after challenging the 2011 Southwest Airlines/AirTran Holdings merger. Joseph Alioto and the Alioto Law Firm have been ordered by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals to pay $67,495 to the defendants of the case that challenged the merger. While motions to sanction lawyers are often filed, they are rarely granted; the court granted the motion after the filing claimed Alioto’s litigation was “unreasonable and vexatious.” According to a professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, granting the motion “almost never happens.” Additionally, the case has stirred up debate on the merit of private antitrust suits that challenge mergers, questioning whether the ruling could potentially discourage other lawyers from bringing such cases. The amount Alioto and the firm were ordered to pay equates the defendants’ law fees.
Featured News
House Votes to Pass CLARITY Act After Drama Threatened to Derail Crypto Market Structure Bill
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Zillow Rejects Compass’s Antitrust Claims Amid Listing Policy Dispute
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
DOJ Probes ServiceNow’s $2.85B AI Merger with Moveworks
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Authors Can Sue Anthropic Over Alleged AI Book Piracy, Judge Rules
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Charter, Cox Request FCC Green Light for $34.5B Merger
Jul 17, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
CPI
Should We Fear Personalized Pricing?
Jul 14, 2025 by
John Yun
Data and Price Competition: The Special Role of Information About Rivals’ Prices
Jul 14, 2025 by
Zach Y. Brown & Alexander MacKay
Surveillance Pricing: A Cautionary Summary of Potential Harms and Solutions
Jul 14, 2025 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
The Rise of Surveillance Pricing
Jul 14, 2025 by
Rebecca Kirk Fair, Alvaro Ziadi & Juan Carvajal