A renowned antitrust plaintiffs’ lawyers based in San Francisco has been hit with a rare order after challenging the 2011 Southwest Airlines/AirTran Holdings merger. Joseph Alioto and the Alioto Law Firm have been ordered by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals to pay $67,495 to the defendants of the case that challenged the merger. While motions to sanction lawyers are often filed, they are rarely granted; the court granted the motion after the filing claimed Alioto’s litigation was “unreasonable and vexatious.” According to a professor at the University of Baltimore School of Law, granting the motion “almost never happens.” Additionally, the case has stirred up debate on the merit of private antitrust suits that challenge mergers, questioning whether the ruling could potentially discourage other lawyers from bringing such cases. The amount Alioto and the firm were ordered to pay equates the defendants’ law fees.
Featured News
Apple Opens Early Settlement Discussions With DOJ
Jul 17, 2026 by
CPI
South Korean Steelmaker POSCO Expands Supplier Support Pact With Antitrust Regulator
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
FCC’s Carr Criticizes California-Led Bid to Block Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Top Court Upholds Antitrust Powers to Seize Corporate Emails
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Uber Launches $14.8 Billion Bid for Delivery Hero in Landmark Food Delivery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Agentic AI & Antitrust
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
AI Agents and Collusion: The Two Faces of Agentic AI
Jul 16, 2026 by
Giovanna Massarotto
Agentic AI’s Regulatory Conundrum
Jul 16, 2026 by
Anant Raut
Inter-AI-Agent Competition
Jul 16, 2026 by
Stefan Thomas
Navigating the Increasing Regulatory Scrutiny of AI-Pricing Tools: Competition and Other Emerging Risks
Jul 16, 2026 by
Mark Krotoski & Vinny Sidhu