A PYMNTS Company

US: Qualcomm accuses Apple of sharing trade secrets with Intel

 |  September 25, 2018

Qualcomm has accused Apple of stealing trade secrets and handing them over to Intel, a filing with the Superior Court of California claims, alleging Apple wanted to use the information to improve the performance of chips provided to it via Intel.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The latest activity in the long-running legal fight between Apple and Qualcomm has the chip producer directly accusing Apple of acquiring “vast swaths” of confidential information, reports CNBC. Filed on Monday, September 24, Qualcomm is intending for the allegations to be included in an existing lawsuit against Apple, if the court allows an amendment to the suit.

    The complaint claims Apple breached the “master software agreement” it signed within the last decade when it became a Qualcomm customer, reported CNBC. As part of the agreement, Apple was required to allow Qualcomm to ensure its source code and tools were being appropriately protected, but it is alleged this may not have been the case.

    This new filing raises a more serious accusation of alleged misdeeds by Apple; whereas the original suit argued that Qualcomm was being prevented from auditing Apple’s use of its source code, now it is claiming that the same source code and tools were stolen for the express purpose of helping Intel, its competitor, overcome engineering flaws in its chips that led to their poor performance in iPhones.

    The discovery was unearthed during its latest lawsuit, which started in November 2017, which is said to highlight Apple engineers repeatedly providing the code and other confidential information under the agreement to Intel’s counterparts. While no direct evidence is offered, there are references to communications between the two sets of engineers that suggests such sharing occurred.

    Full Content: CNBC

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.