
State and federal regulators want to prevent Binance.US from buying bankrupt crypto rival Voyager.
Court filings Wednesday (Feb. 22) show both the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) objecting to the $1 billion deal, saying it could be illegal.
The filing follows last month’s limited objection by the SEC to the purchase and comes amid a wave of regulatory action against the cryptocurrency industry.
According to the SEC, Binance.US’ — the American arm of the world’s largest crypto firm — planned acquisition could violate laws governing the unregistered sale of securities. The commission also worries about the reported criminal investigations into Binance.
“There are numerous public reports and press accounts concerning investigations into the purchaser and its affiliates,” the filing said. “Regulatory actions, whether involving Voyager, Binance.US or both, could render the transactions in the plan impossible to consummate, thus making the plan unfeasible.”
Read more: SEC & Texas Object To Binance.US Voyager Deal
Reached for comment by PYMNTS Thursday, a Binance.US spokesperson said the company will “work with relevant parties to provide any requested information,” adding that the company’s “customer assets always remain on the platform, are held on a 1:1 basis and are fully reserved.”
“We look forward to bringing Voyager customers to Binance.US, and are pleased that 97% of Voyager customers have already voted to approve our plan,” the spokesperson said.
In its objection to the sale, the NYDFS cited allegations that Voyager was illegally serving customers in New York.
“Despite the fact that none of the Debtors are licensed in New York, the Department is aware of allegations and other information indicating that one or more of the Debtors may have operated and may be continuing to operate in New York in violation of Applicable Law,” the filing said.
Binance.US announced plans to buy Voyager’s assets in December, saying it hoped to return customer funds as quickly as possible.
Featured News
Judge Orders Apple to Address Fortnite App Block or Face Court Hearing
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Civil Society Groups and Labor Unions Raise Alarm Over Proposed Changes to GDPR
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Regulators Push Back Deadline on UniCredit’s Takeover Bid for Banco BPM
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Intel Challenges €376 Million EU Fine in Ongoing Antitrust Dispute
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Red Bull Challenges EU Commission Over Lengthy Antitrust Inspection
May 19, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Healthcare Antitrust
May 14, 2025 by
CPI
Healthcare & Antitrust: What to Expect in the New Trump Administration
May 14, 2025 by
Nana Wilberforce, John W O'Toole & Sarah Pugh
Patent Gaming and Disparagement: Commission Fines Teva For Improperly Protecting Its Blockbuster Medicine
May 14, 2025 by
Blaž Višnar, Boris Andrejaš, Apostolos Baltzopoulos, Rieke Kaup, Laura Nistor & Gianluca Vassallo
Strategic Alliances in the Pharma Sector: An EU Competition Law Perspective
May 14, 2025 by
Christian Ritz & Benedikt Weiss
Monopsony Power in the Hospital Labor Market
May 14, 2025 by
Kevin E. Pflum & Christian Salas