The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that an antitrust lawsuit initiated by Mississippi against LCD screen makers could not be moved to federal court as the defendants had wished, a decision reports say will make it more difficult to sue foreign companies in domestic courts.
The New York Times reported Tuesday that the SCOTUS unanimously voted that the case, which brought legal action against liquid crystal display makers AU Optronics and Sharp for allegations of price-fixing, must remain in Mississippi. The companies, who were found by federal regulators to have fixed LCD prices in a worldwide scandal, looked to have the case moved to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 on hopes they would receive a more positive outcome than in state court.
The companies had looked to qualify the lawsuit as a so-called “mass action” under the 2005 law in order to move the case. To qualify, there must be more than 100 plaintiffs in a state that could be considered hostile against corporate defendants.
But SCOTUS’s decision Tuesday found that the lawsuit did not qualify as a mass action as Mississippi was the only named plaintiff. An attempt to name all plaintiffs involved, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, would lead to “an administrative nightmare that Congress could not possibly have intended.”
The SCOTUS ruling overturns a lower court’s decision that the case should be heard in federal court.
Reports say the unanimous ruling, along with a second decision also revealed Tuesday regarding human rights abuses in Argentina, will make it more difficult for plaintiffs to sue foreign firms in federal court.
Full Content: Insurance Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI