The US Supreme Court has issued a sweeping ruling on so-called pay-for-delay schemes, coming to the decision that drugmakers can be sued for the agreements that are made to delay the release of generic, often cheaper drugs in stores. The 5-3 ruling overturns a previous decision from a lesser court and will be welcomed by the Federal Trade Commission, which has been combating the practice for several years on the opinion that the agreements lead to higher prices for consumers. Pharmaceutical giants largely defended the practice by claiming the pay-for-delay agreements, also known as reverse payments, were patent settlements. According to reports, the ruling could open a floodgate of litigation against some of those pharmaceutical companies by health insurers, drug retailers, wholesalers and more antitrust regulators; companies like Bayer AG are already facing lawsuits. The FTC reported that 40 such agreements were made in 2012. The Court did not back the Commission’s proposal to declare the agreements anticompetitive, however; Justice Stephen Breyer stated that each agreement should be evaluated under the “rule of reason” standard.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Related Content:
Click here to read the Supreme Court’s full decision.
Official statement from the FTC’s Chairwoman Edith Ramirez
Antitrust guru Mark Lemley responds to pay-for-delay ruling
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Qualcomm Challenges Arm’s Market Power in Antitrust Complaints Worldwide
Mar 26, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Partially Dismisses Investor Suit Against Google Over Ad Practices
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Scrutinizes Ticketmaster’s Dynamic Pricing Amid Oasis Ticket Controversy
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Democratic Senators Urge White House to Seek Congressional Approval for TikTok Deadline Extension
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Spain’s Antitrust Authority Probes Generali and Sanitas Over Competition Concerns
Mar 25, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Mobile Ecosystems
Mar 24, 2025 by
CPI
Mobile Ecosystems: An Intellectual Entelechy but A Necessary Model
Mar 24, 2025 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
Creating Contestability and Fairness in Mobile Ecosystems: The Contribution of the DMA
Mar 24, 2025 by
Damien Geradin & Daniel Mandrescu
Digital Ecosystems and the Not (Yet) As Efficient Competitor Principle
Mar 24, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Assessing the Competition Law Scrutiny of Smart Wearables and Mobile AR/VR Devices
Mar 24, 2025 by
Kayvan Hazemi-Jebelli