The US Supreme Court has reportedly agreed to hear a case to rule whether the state of Mississippi can proceed to sue AU Optronics, a Taiwan-based manufacturer of LCD screens accused of a global price-fixing scandal, in state court. According to reports, state courts tend to lean in favor of plaintiffs; AU Optronics, as well as other LCD makers sued by other states, looked to have the cases moved to federal court. Thirteen states in all have initiated lawsuits against the companies, which continue to face various lawsuits and criminal investigations concerning the allegations of price-fixing. The Supreme Court only agreed to hear Mississippi’s case, however; AU Optronics succeeded in motioning the move the case from a Mississippi court to a federal one. The 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals denied to move the lawsuit back to state level. According to reports, the nation’s highest appeals court will now rule whether state-level lawsuits filed by citizens can be interpreted similar to a class action and therefore be allowed to move to federal courts.
Featured News
Perkins Coie Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Leader as Partner in Washington
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Ryanair Boss Dismisses Musk’s Buyout as Starlink Feud Escalates
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Extends Warner Bros Bid as Netflix Rivalry Heats Up
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Breaks New Ground With Landmark AI Law
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
NYDFS Warns Banks They Can’t Outsource Vendor Risk
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark Rosman & KaDee L. Ru