A PYMNTS Company

US: Sprint investors granted class action status in 2005 Nextel merger case

By  |  April 3, 2014

A federal judge ruled last week that a group of Sprint investors could sue as a class against the company and its former CEO over its 2005 merger with Nextel, according to reports.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    US District Judge Eric Melgen ruled March 27 to grant the plaintiffs class action status. The investors argue that they were misled about the financial implications of the transaction, which resulted in one of the globe’s top wireless firms. The companies, however, are accused of misleading their investors by inflating stock prices after the transaction was complete.

    According to court documents, the plaintiffs claim Sprint lost thousands of customers between 2006 and 2008 as a result of technical difficulties of the transaction. Despite the financial struggles, the investors claim Sprint continued to send out press releases and regulatory filings that claimed the company was benefitting from the deal.

    It wasn’t until Dan Hesse replaced Gary Forsee as Sprint CEO that the financial losses were revealed.

    In his ruling, Judge Melgen write that “a single class action is a preferable and superior method to duplicative litigation by individual parties.”

    Full Content: Inside Counsel

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.