As both sides gear up to present their oral arguments beginning in October, the antitrust dispute between the North Carolina Dental Board and the US Federal Trade Commission – which has reached the Supreme Court – is already heating up.
According to reports, the dental board submitted a brief with SCOTUS urging the top court to reject the FTC’s “radical departure” from established antitrust precedent. The group of dental practitioners is fighting to be legally considered a state entity to qualify for antitrust immunity after the FTC issued an administrative complaint in 2010 against the Board.
The dispute arose when the board launched investigations into teeth whitening services provided by non-dentists; the Board eventually issued cease-and-desist letters to those non-dentist groups. The FTC, however, claimed that the action unfairly manipulated the market in favor of dentist teeth whiteners. Federal officials also argued that because the Board is made up of practicing dentists, the group has an unfair advantage to promote their own services.
The Supreme Court agreed earlier this year to hear the case, which will hear the FTC’s argument that because the Board is made up of dentists, the group should be considered a private entity.
The Board’s submission, submitted last week, highlights its own argument, that it qualifies for antitrust immunity as a state agency.
In its brief, the dental group is challenging the FTC’s claim that antitrust immunity is only available for “disinterested public officials.”
Oral arguments in the case are set to begin next month and, according to reports, could disrupt how state regulators are treated under federal competition laws.
Full content: National Law Review
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI