The US Supreme Court ruled this week that Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company, will not be forced to defend itself against a major, multi-million dollar class action in a 5-4 vote overturning a lower court’s previous decision. According to the Justices, the lawsuit, which accused the cable company of monopolizing the market in Philadelphia, was too “unwieldy” to proceed. The Comcast customers accused the company of colluding with competitors to exchange territories, allegedly ensuring control over the market – claims that Comcast denies. The Court’s opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia explained that the class action failed to meet requirements demonstrating the levels of monetary damages for each of the individual parties of the suit, and that the plaintiffs’ allegations were too broad.
Full Content: Bloomberg
Related Content: March 2013 Blog o’ Blogs
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Belgian Authorities Detain Multiple Individuals Over Alleged Huawei Bribery in EU Parliament
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Grubhub’s Antitrust Case to Proceed in Federal Court, Second Circuit Rules
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Pharma Giants Mallinckrodt and Endo to Merge in Multi-Billion-Dollar Deal
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
FTC Targets Meta’s Market Power, Calls Zuckerberg to Testify
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
French Watchdog Approves Carrefour’s Expansion, Orders Store Sell-Off
Mar 13, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li