A $35.5 million class action settlement was put on hold on Tuesday by a federal appeals court in a case against baby product companies. According to reports, the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia overturned a district court’s approval of the settlement over concerns about attorneys’ fees as well as the distribution-of-funds process. The settlement was reached in a class action suit against Toys R Us Inc. and baby product manufacturers after allegations the companies colluded to fix prices. The appeals court found that only $3 million of the $35.5 million settlement would actually land in the hands of consumers, while the rest would go to attorneys’ fees; about $18.5 million would be donated to a charity designated by the parties involved. According to the appeals court, the district court judge was unaware of this distribution.
Featured News
Federal Court Narrows Turkey Price-Fixing Lawsuit, Clears Perdue and Foster Farms
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Italy Penalizes Character.AI Owner Over Child Safety and Privacy Controls
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
State AGs Prepare Antitrust Complaint Against Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Latham & Watkins Expands Brussels Antitrust Practice
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
EU Makes SAP Antitrust Commitments Binding in ERP Support Case
Jul 9, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Due Process
Jul 7, 2026 by
CPI
The Hart‑Scott‑Rodino Act at Fifty: Procedure, Thresholds, Serial Acquisitions, and Industry Dynamics
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ginger Zhe Jin, Mario Leccese, Daniel Sokol, Liad Wagman & Mengyi Zhong
Due Process In Competition Cases: Reflections As Of 2026
Jul 7, 2026 by
Ian Forrester & Pablo Trevisan
When Referees Become Reformers: Due Process and Constitutional Considerations in Competition Market Investigations
Jul 7, 2026 by
John Taladay & Christine Ryu-Naya
Procedural Fairness in Antitrust Enforcement: A Comparative Analysis
Jul 7, 2026 by
J. Mark Gidley & Daniel Sokol