A PYMNTS Company

US: Umpires Skeptical Over MLB Exemption Challenge

 |  April 19, 2017

According to Espn this week the 9th District Court of Appeals was skeptical with changing the antitrust exception for for minor league baseball players .

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In this case Sergio Miranda, an infielder drafted by the Chicago White Sox in 2007, sued Major League Baseball, then-Commissioner Bud Selig and the 30 clubs in 2014 along with several other minor leaguers, alleging the sport’s minor league reserve system violates federal antitrust law. The suit was dismissed on Sept. 24, 2015, by U.S. District Judge Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., and the minor leaguers wants the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reinstate the action.

    Baseball was granted an antitrust exemption by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1922, which ruled baseball was not interstate commerce, and the Supreme Court reaffirmed its stance in 1953 and 1972.

    According to Espn lawyers argued for about 15 minutes on Monday. The judges presiding were Chief Judge Sidney Runyan Thomas, Senior Circuit Judge Ferdinand Francis Fernandez, and Circuit Judge Mary Helen Murguia.

    “There’s been (a) 95-year history of the incorrect application of the antitrust laws to the `business of baseball,” said Samuel Kornhauser, a lawyer for the minor leaguers. “”It’s not 1922 where baseball was struggling.”

    The court did not appear to be sympathetic.

    “The Supreme Court has given no indication it’s changing its mind,” Thomas said.

    “How are we not constrained by that?” Murguia said of the Supreme Court.

    A separate suit by minor leaguers alleging they are paid less than minimum wage was certified as a class action in March by the federal court in San Francisco.

    Read more Espn

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.