A lawsuit that has potentially major implications for the nation’s cable television market has been motioned for dismissal by defendant Viacom. The case, initiated by cable company Cablevision, alleges that network owner forced anticompetitive fines on Cablevision, threatening the company with a ten-figure fine if Cablevision did not license lesser-watched networks in addition to popular ones. In response, Viacom motioned to have the case dismissed on Wednesday, denying accusations that the company has taken part in per say illegal tying and bundling. Further, Viacom is accusing Cablevision of contradicting itself in its arguments of this case, compared with arguments made in the past to the regulators the Federal Communications Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission. As an example, Viacom highlights last year’s Brantley v. NBCU case, in which Cablevision was a defendant; the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that tying arrangements do not necessarily harm competition.
Featured News
Justice Department Backs xAI in Environmental Lawsuit Over Mississippi Data Center
Jun 16, 2026 by
CPI
National Security Concerns Are Shaping AI Infrastructure Development
Jun 16, 2026 by
CPI
Colorado Refines, Rather Than Retreats From, AI Regulation
Jun 16, 2026 by
CPI
Canada Opens Broad Antitrust Investigation Into Food Supply Chain Amid Cost Concerns
Jun 16, 2026 by
CPI
Ballard Spahr Strengthens Antitrust Bench as Competition Work Intensifies
Jun 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani