On January 30, Visa and MasterCard filed motions to dismiss three cases, all of which allege a conspiracy to fix ATM fees: Mackmin (No. 1:11-cv-01831), Stoumbos (No. 1:11-cv-01882), National ATM Council (No. 1:11-cv-01803). At dispute in Mackmin and Stoumbos are fees that consumers must pay when making transactions at ATMs not operated by the banks at which they have accounts. The National ATM Council is a trade association of ATM operators. All three claim that the defendants have rules that prevent ATM operators from charging higher access fees for transactions completed over Visa and Mastercard networks.
In their motion to dismiss, Visa and MasterCard argue that the facts alleged by the plaintiffs are insufficient to establish a conspiracy to restrain trade, and furthermore, that the facts fail to establish an antitrust injury because the rules prevent higher fees from being charged to consumers.
Source: The Blog of Legal Times
Featured News
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
X May Be Excluded from EU’s Strict Tech Rules, Sources Suggest
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
G7 Targets Competitive Imbalances in Semiconductor Industry
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh