India’s Competition Commission is currently scrutinizing allegations of collusion between France’s Pernod Ricard and retailers in New Delhi. Legal documents obtained by Reuters shed light on the latest challenges faced by the spirits giant in one of its crucial markets.
Pernod Ricard, renowned for brands like Chivas Regal, Glenlivet and Absolut vodka, commands a significant 17% share in India’s liquor market, which it claims is its second-largest globally in terms of net sales. However, the company finds itself entangled in a web of licensing, taxation and antitrust issues in the region, as reported by Reuters.
The accusations, brought forth in a confidential filing in March, focus on alleged practices within the liquor industry. The filing, attributed to an individual known only as Mohit, who has a history of initiating public interest litigations, implicates Pernod Ricard in collusive activities with New Delhi retailers.
According to Reuters, a source familiar with the matter, speaking on condition of anonymity, revealed that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is currently evaluating the case. The CCI holds the authority to initiate a full investigation or dismiss the allegations if found unsubstantiated.
The crux of the allegations against Pernod Ricard: purported maneuvers to expand market share. The filing alleges that the company persuaded retailers in the Indian capital to increase their stock of Pernod products by offering assistance in securing loans for store licenses.
Reuters, which reviewed the confidential filing in accordance with the watchdog’s guidelines, highlighted that Pernod Ricard stated it had not been formally notified of the antitrust case. However, the company affirmed its commitment to compliance with local laws and vowed to educate its teams accordingly.
The allegations are largely based on the findings of India’s Enforcement Directorate, currently investigating Pernod Ricard’s alleged involvement in a corruption case related to New Delhi’s liquor policy. A company official was arrested in 2022 in connection with the case.
Drawing from the Enforcement Directorate’s findings, the CCI complaint alleges that Pernod Ricard provided $24 million in corporate guarantees to its bankers in 2021 to facilitate loans for city retailers. In return, these retailers purportedly ensured that 35% of their stock comprised Pernod Ricard brands.
Featured News
Spain’s Financial Regulator Awaits Antitrust Decision on BBVA’s Hostile Bid for Sabadell
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
RealPage Seeks Dismissal of DOJ Antitrust Suit, Citing Legal Flaws
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
EU Competition Chief Signals Potential Google Breakup Amid Big Tech Scrutiny
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Turkey Closes Antitrust Probe into Meta’s Threads-Instagram Practices
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Major Overhaul of New Zealand Competition Laws Announced
Dec 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Moats & Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Assessing the Potential for Antitrust Moats and Trenches in the Generative AI Industry
Nov 29, 2024 by
Allison Holt, Sushrut Jain & Ashley Zhou
How SEP Hold-up Can Lead to Entrenchment
Nov 29, 2024 by
Jay Jurata, Elena Kamenir & Christie Boyden
The Role of Moats in Unlocking Economic Growth
Nov 29, 2024 by
CPI
Overcoming Moats and Entrenchment: Disruptive Innovation in Generative AI May Be More Successful than Regulation
Nov 29, 2024 by
Simon Chisholm & Charlie Whitehead