Persistent ambiguity surrounds the widely accepted view that antitrust law exists to prevent “harm to the competitive process.” While interpretations of this phrase typically divide along familiar ideological lines, ambiguity in the meaning of harm to the competitive process presents an opportunity for dialogue. This essay advocates for more explicit interrogation of the normative criteria that define what constitutes harm to the competitive process. Thoughtful evaluation of the alternatives
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.14.81
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!