Posted by Social Science Research Network
What the German Auto Scandal Teaches Us About the Consumer Welfare Standard
By David A. Balto
There is a vibrant debate going on right now about the proper role of antitrust and whether this role is best served by the consumer welfare standard. Many of those that would support a new standard do so because of a belief that antitrust law should do more to shape our economy under a broader policy mandate. These calls should be rejected. Expanding the policy goals of antitrust law would not only lead us into areas where we do antitrust policy does not have the proper tools, it would also intrude into other policy areas are a better fit for these problems.
The fallout from “Dieselgate” or the Volkswagen emissions scandal provides a good test case for how the consumer welfare standard grounds antitrust policy.
Featured News
Supreme Court Rejects Uber and Lyft’s Appeal in California Gig Worker Suits
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Supreme Court Sidesteps 5-Hour Energy Pricing Case, Allowing Antitrust Claims to Proceed
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Tempur Sealy and Mattress Firm Argue FTC Proceedings Are Unconstitutional in New Suit
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Korean Telecom Giants Face Potential $4.1 Billion Fine Over Price-Fixing Allegations
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Mexico’s Antitrust Authority Targets Gruma for Market Control
Oct 7, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh