This article is part of a Chronicle. See more from this Chronicle
Jonathan Jacobson, Valentina Rucker, Jan 07, 2008
Although the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko circumscribed a plaintiff’s ability to set forth a claim against a monopolist for a refusal to deal, the case left many unanswered questions with regard to the appropriate standards to apply in unilateral conduct cases. One uncertainty created by the Trinko deci
...THIS ARTICLE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR IP ADDRESS 18.97.9.169
Please verify email or join us to access premium content!