Bill Allan, Apr 01, 2006
DG Competition’s discussion paper appears to signal a departure from the form-based approach articulated most strongly in Michelin II. However, its full significance is limited by the enunciation of a precautionary principle under which abuse is framed to capture any conduct likely to limit entry or expansion and justification is limited to the narrowest plausible extent. While that approach reflects a concern to prevent the erection of artificial entry barriers, it results in rules that undervalue existing competition. That risk is compounded by a narrow approach to market definition and dominance. These problems will only be avoided if the European Commission fully embraces a standard based on a determination that the disputed conduct substantially lessens effective competition in a way that can effectively be remedied by intervention under Article 82 of the EC Treaty.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Ditch WhatsApp for Paris-Made Chat App, Urges French PM to Ministers
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Warren & Others Accuse Anesthesiology Giant of Anticompetitive Practices
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Blackstone to Acquire Rover Group in $2.3 Billion Deal
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Canada & Google Reach Deal to Preserve News in Search Results Amidst Online News Act
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Adobe Gears Up to Defend Figma Deal in December 8 EU Hearing
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Consent Decrees
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
Consent Decrees Under the Biden Administration
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
The FTC´s Prior Approval Mischief
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
Fix-It-First: A Seismic Shift in U.S. Antitrust Agency Approaches to Merger Remedies
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
“Shadow” Settlements and the Tunney Act
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI