Bruno Lasserre, May 20, 2011
With the economic recession taking over from the financial crisis of 2008, attention has focused less on issues such as merger review and State aid control, and more on antitrust properly speaking, meaning the prohibition of cartels and abuses of dominance, as well as the enforcement of this prohibition by means of administrative fines imposed on corporations and/or of criminal penalties directed to individuals. Among other items, this agenda has included the following questions: 1) whether corporate fines are excessive or indeed misdirected and should be replaced in whole or at least in part by individual penalties; 2) whether antitrust enforcement itself is a luxury good or even an idea of yesterday, and should be abandoned or at least significantly relaxed.
Featured News
Farmers Take Union Pacific and K&O to Court Over Alleged Rail Fee Scheme
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
Erli Accuses Allegro of Abusing Market Power in New Legal Battle
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
Devon, Coterra Strike $58 Billion Deal to Build Shale Powerhouse
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
California Lawmakers Set to Take Up Expanded Antitrust Proposals After Commission Vote
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
Key Cybersecurity Measures Again Hang in Balance Amid Partial Government Shutdown
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber