Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development (1950)(reprint)
Dec 20, 2013
To have the incentive to undertake research and development, a firm must be able to appropriate returns sufficient to make the investment worthwhile. The benefits consumers derive from an innovation, however, are increased if competitors can imitate and improve on the innovation to ensure its availability on favorable terms. Patent law seeks to resolve this tension between incentives for innovation and widespread diffusion of benefits. A patent confers, in theory, perfect appropriability (monopoly of the invention) for a limited time in return for a public disclosure that ensures, again in theory, widespread diffusion of benefits when the patent expires.
Featured News
Medtronic Slapped With $382M Antitrust Verdict in Bundling Case
Feb 6, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Senators Push Back as Trump Admin Greenlights Direct-to-Consumer Drug Sales
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Rio Tinto and Glencore Call Off Talks on $260B Mining Tie-Up
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Senate Bill Aims to Curb Fraud Ads on Social Media Platforms
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Pentagon Pressed to Review SpaceX Over Alleged Chinese Investment Links
Feb 5, 2026 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber