Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development (1950)(reprint)
Dec 20, 2013
To have the incentive to undertake research and development, a firm must be able to appropriate returns sufficient to make the investment worthwhile. The benefits consumers derive from an innovation, however, are increased if competitors can imitate and improve on the innovation to ensure its availability on favorable terms. Patent law seeks to resolve this tension between incentives for innovation and widespread diffusion of benefits. A patent confers, in theory, perfect appropriability (monopoly of the invention) for a limited time in return for a public disclosure that ensures, again in theory, widespread diffusion of benefits when the patent expires.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Intel Succeeds in Overturning $2B Patent Verdict
Dec 4, 2023 by
CPI
McDonald’s Appeals to Supreme Court in No-Poach Case
Dec 4, 2023 by
CPI
Disney Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Class Action by TV Streamers Over Subscription Price Hikes
Dec 4, 2023 by
CPI
Sky Secures Dominant Position in Premier League Broadcasting with £6.7bn Deal
Dec 4, 2023 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Announces $1.9 Billion Acquisition of Hawaiian Airlines
Dec 4, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI