Assessing the Quality of Competition Policy: The Case of Horizontal Merger Enforcement
William Kovacic, Apr 30, 2009
This article suggests how a jurisdiction might best go about evaluating the quality of its competition policy system. It urges that competition agencies and collateral institutions strive to improve our ability to measure the economic effects of merger control and to verify the consequences of different approaches to enforcement. The article uses merger control in the United States as its main illustration, but the article´s observations apply to other areas of competition policy oversight, as well. The article seeks to encourage the recent trend within the global competition policy community of accepting a norm that focuses greater attention on the evaluation of the economic effects of enforcement decisions especially by developing better quantitative measures of actual economic effects and the assessment of the processes by which competition agencies examine individual transactions.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Ditch WhatsApp for Paris-Made Chat App, Urges French PM to Ministers
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Warren & Others Accuse Anesthesiology Giant of Anticompetitive Practices
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Blackstone to Acquire Rover Group in $2.3 Billion Deal
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Canada & Google Reach Deal to Preserve News in Search Results Amidst Online News Act
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Adobe Gears Up to Defend Figma Deal in December 8 EU Hearing
Nov 29, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Consent Decrees
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
Consent Decrees Under the Biden Administration
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
The FTC´s Prior Approval Mischief
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
Fix-It-First: A Seismic Shift in U.S. Antitrust Agency Approaches to Merger Remedies
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI
“Shadow” Settlements and the Tunney Act
Nov 15, 2023 by
CPI