Assessing Unfair Pricing Under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law for Innovation-Intensive Industries
David Evans, Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, Xinzhu Zhang, Sep 11, 2014
China, like a number of other antitrust jurisdictions, has a law concerning unfair pricing. This article develops an economic framework for applying the unfair pricing law in China. The framework draws on the experience of courts and competition authorities in other jurisdictions and the writings of various commentators, particularly economists, on unfair pricing in those jurisdictions. It shows that virtually all jurisdictions have decided to consider unfair pricing claims only in exceptional circumstances, and rarely, if ever, in innovation-intensive industries. For those cases that pass this screen and receive consideration, the courts and competition authorities then, under the leading test, insist on substantial evidence that the price is significantly higher than cost and is unfair given the value provided to the buyer. This article shows that the exceptional circumstances screen and the rigorous unfair pricing test are motivated by a recognition, supported by substantial empirical evidence, that successful firms must have the assurance of receiving significant rewards to induce them to invest time and capital in highly risky innovation that is the source of economic growth and welfare. It concludes by showing that this approach is consistent with modern Chinese economic policy.
Featured News
California AG Says No Paramount Settlement Talks Scheduled
Aug 25, 2026 by
CPI
Judge Lets Antitrust Case Against 32 US Universities Move Forward
Aug 25, 2026 by
CPI
CoStar Hit With Consolidated Antitrust Challenge Over Property Data
Aug 25, 2026 by
CPI
Express Scripts Wins Dismissal of Nonprofit Pharmacy’s Antitrust Claims
Aug 25, 2026 by
CPI
Draghi, Business Leaders Form Group Focused on European Competitiveness
Aug 25, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Antipasto
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
“Anti-Monopoly” Antitrust Enforcement: Lessons Learned from the Biden Administration
Aug 24, 2026 by
Diana L. Moss
FTC v. Meta: The Importance of Quantitative Evidence in Antitrust
Aug 24, 2026 by
Dennis Carlton, John A. List, Allan Shampine, Hal Sider & Theresa Sullivan
Competitor Information Exchanges: Reducing Market Uncertainty Is What Matters, Not Level Of Detail
Aug 24, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka, Assimakis Komninos, James Killick & Nina Frie
When Politics Meets Merger Control: 10 Transatlantic Takeaways
Aug 24, 2026 by
Rachel Brandenburger