Assessing Unfair Pricing Under China’s Anti-Monopoly Law for Innovation-Intensive Industries
David Evans, Vanessa Yanhua Zhang, Xinzhu Zhang, Sep 11, 2014
China, like a number of other antitrust jurisdictions, has a law concerning unfair pricing. This article develops an economic framework for applying the unfair pricing law in China. The framework draws on the experience of courts and competition authorities in other jurisdictions and the writings of various commentators, particularly economists, on unfair pricing in those jurisdictions. It shows that virtually all jurisdictions have decided to consider unfair pricing claims only in exceptional circumstances, and rarely, if ever, in innovation-intensive industries. For those cases that pass this screen and receive consideration, the courts and competition authorities then, under the leading test, insist on substantial evidence that the price is significantly higher than cost and is unfair given the value provided to the buyer. This article shows that the exceptional circumstances screen and the rigorous unfair pricing test are motivated by a recognition, supported by substantial empirical evidence, that successful firms must have the assurance of receiving significant rewards to induce them to invest time and capital in highly risky innovation that is the source of economic growth and welfare. It concludes by showing that this approach is consistent with modern Chinese economic policy.
Featured News
Michigan Loses Antitrust Case Accusing Oil Giants of Blocking Renewable Energy
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Chief Says European SpaceX Challenger Will Face Full Merger Scrutiny
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
Canada Competition Bureau, Empire Settle Grocery Property-Control Probe
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
DoorDash $131.5 Million Settlement Puts New Focus on Gig Economy Regulation
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
UN Chief Presses for Global AI Framework With Independent Oversight
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton