Brazil’s competition agency, CADE, has declared that the companies Brasfrigo, Brasfrigo SA and Goias Verde will be fined with a total of 3 million BR, as punishment for ‘gun jumping’ the approval of their merger, which was yet to be given by the proper authorities. Goias Verde’s acquisition of Brasfrigo, the root of this case, involved the purchase of all of Brasfrigo’s production assets and brands, including canned vegetable brands Jurema, Jussara, Tomatino and Terrabela.
The violation was detected in late 2014, when the companies would have violated a pact to preserve the acquisition’s reversibility by failing to maintain all the acquired assets in an active and productive capacity. Commenting on the decision, Commissioner Ana Frazão said “the absence of notification has prematurely altered the competition outlook, bringing illegal benefits to the parties, especially to the buyer…”.
Goias Verde was found to be selling Brasfrigo brands on their own website, and even modifying the design of Jurema’s packaging. Goias Verde will be forbidden from selling this brand within Brazil for at least 2 years. Despite the similarities between the companies, the merger was likely to be approved without much discussion due to the minimal level of market concentration it would entail, as well as a number of other competitors in the market.
Full content: CADE
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI