Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
India Defends Global Turnover Antitrust Rule as Apple Challenges Multibillion-Dollar Fine
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
China Probes Food Delivery Platforms Over Competition Practices
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Urges Congress to Scrutinize Netflix Deal for Warner Bros. Discovery Assets
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
X Claims Music Publishers Colluded to Enforce Costly Licensing Terms
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
EU Issues Guidance to Clarify Enforcement of Foreign Subsidies Rules
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi