Corinne Chew, R. Ian McEwin, Nov 05, 2010
The Baidu case, one of the first abuse of dominance cases in China, is important in several respects. First, it was one of the first private competition law actions in China. Second, the judgment was read out in a real-time broadcast. Third, the legal reasoning was more detailed than in other competition law cases. Fourth, the Court stressed the importance of economic reasoning and evidence in deciding such cases. This paper analyzes both the facts of the case and its significance.
Featured News
Bill Introduced to Ban ‘Insider Trading’ by Federal Officials on Prediction Markets
Jan 12, 2026 by
CPI
WilmerHale Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Leader Ryan Danks to Washington Practice
Jan 12, 2026 by
CPI
UK’s Regulator Probes Elon Musk’s X Over Grok Deepfake Concerns
Jan 12, 2026 by
CPI
India Proposal to Access Smartphone Source Code Triggers Pushback From Apple, Samsung
Jan 12, 2026 by
CPI
UK Regulator Clears All Mergers in 2025 After Shift Toward Pro-Business Stance
Jan 12, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi