Home brokerage giant Compass has reached a settlement totaling nearly $58 million to address accusations of conspiring to overcharge U.S. home sellers on commissions paid to agents. The proposed settlement, disclosed by plaintiffs’ lawyers in Missouri federal court on Friday, marks a pivotal moment in a nationwide legal battle over commission practices.
The agreement, which awaits approval by a judge, follows a wave of litigation targeting major players in the residential real estate market. Earlier this month, the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and several other prominent brokerages agreed to pay over $626 million in related lawsuits involving home-seller commissions, per Reuters.
Compass CEO Robert Reffkin, while emphasizing the company’s non-admission of wrongdoing, expressed satisfaction with resolving the claims to mitigate disruptions. This settlement underscores the growing pressure on industry leaders to address concerns about commission structures and antitrust violations.
Mike Ketchmark, an attorney representing the home-seller plaintiffs, highlighted the momentum building against traditional commission practices, stating, “Brokers around the country are continuing to join with NAR in abandoning this broken system. We expect many more settlements in the coming months.”
Read more: Colorado Real Estate Market Transformed by Antitrust Settlement
At the heart of the legal disputes are allegations that large residential home brokerages, including Compass, enforced practices that compelled home sellers to pay commissions to buyer’s agents to list their properties for sale. These commissions, typically ranging from 5% to 6% of a home’s sale price, have drawn scrutiny for their potential to inflate costs for sellers.
The settlement with Compass follows a landmark jury decision in October, where a Kansas City, Missouri, jury awarded $1.8 billion in damages to a class of Missouri-area home sellers in a case against the National Association of Realtors and other entities. Plaintiffs’ attorneys are now poised to seek preliminary approval from a U.S. judge in Kansas City for the recent settlement, which not only involves a substantial financial payout but also includes commitments from NAR to revise its policies regarding compensation to buyer’s brokers.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Shein Faces EU Regulations Over User Data
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Fights Back Against US Antitrust Lawsuit
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
US Homeland Security Establishes Blue-Ribbon Board with Tech CEOs to Advise on AI
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Accuses Amazon Executives of Using Disappearing Messaging Apps to Conceal Evidence
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI