By: Jorge Jaeckel Kovács and Claudia Montoya Naranjo Jaeckel/Montoya Abogados
There is no doubt that disloyal competition is one of the hardest practices to regulate for any legislator, and one of the most vague and difficult to interpret for those who are charged with applying the law.
The following study analyses the concept of Unfair competition, starting by establishing the judicial figure covered by current norms. The study goes on to study common assumptions regarding articles 8 and 19 in in the 1996 Law 256, as well as its judicial character and reach.
Download full paper Here.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Microsoft Faces EU Antitrust Charges Over Teams Software
May 13, 2024 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Complaint Filed Against Edwards Lifesciences by Indian Rival Meril
May 13, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Watchdog Partners with AliExpress and Temu to Address Safety Concerns
May 13, 2024 by
CPI
EU Designates Booking.com as ‘Gatekeeper’ Under Digital Markets Act
May 13, 2024 by
CPI
US Airlines Challenge Biden Administration Over New Airfare Fee Disclosure Rule
May 13, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI