Competition Policy in Consumer Financial Services: The Disparate Regulation of Online Marketplace Lenders and Banks
Thomas P. Brown and Molly E. Swartz, March 20, 2016
In October 2014, Washington D.C. City Council passed legislation that effectively allowed Uber to operate in the District. David Plouffe, formerly an advisor to the President and now an executive with Uber, greeted the new legislation with the following observation:
Obviously what we’re doing doesn’t necessarily in all cases fit in existing regulation. I think that’s what Washington really wrestled with and decided they needed to chart a new pathway forward. So rather than say how do we fit this new technology and service into existing regulations, let’s look at how do we create new regulations that give citizens of the city the right kind of confidence on things like safety, on things like insurance.
Uber is just one of many startups struggling to fit their businesses into existing regulatory frameworks. As technological innovation leads to new business models, there is increasing friction between these new companies and the existing regulatory regime.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Alaska Airlines’ Hawaiian Acquisition Faces Antitrust Scrutiny
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
Ulmer & Greensfelder Merge to Form UB Greensfelder
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
Apple’s iMessage May Be Exempt from New EU Regulations
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
UK Watchdog Warns Firms on AI Privacy Compliance
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
FTC Mounts Second Challenge to Microsoft’s Activision Buy Despite Closed Deal
Dec 6, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI