A PYMNTS Company

Digital disruption demands antitrust restraint

By  |  July 4, 2018

Posted By The Hill

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Digital disruption demands antitrust restraint

    By Jonathan Barnett 

    Since Nov. 20, the date on which the Department of Justice Antitrust Division launched its challenge to the AT&T-Time Warner merger, through June 27, the date on which the division announced its conditional approval of the Disney-Fox merger, the media and entertainment marketplace has been peering deep into the legal crystal ball to anticipate the antitrust fortunes of these two landmark transactions.

    For those who reflexively follow the “big is bad” principle, the Antitrust Division’s aggressive challenge to the AT&T-Time Warner combination was a welcome surprise while its failure to challenge the Disney-Fox combination in its entirety was a predictable disappointment.

    Yet, courts demand persuasive evidence that a combination will likely result in net harm to consumers — an economic translation of the statute’s prohibition of only combinations where “the effect … may be substantially to lessen competition.”

    Absent this evidentiary safeguard, dealmakers could not assess regulatory risk and firms would shy away from acquisitions that can enhance shareholder value and benefit consumers.

    Continue reading…