On Monday, Qualcomm raised concerns about the European Union’s ongoing antitrust investigation during hearings before the European Union’s second-highest court. They argued that law enforcement actions were being taken without any evidence of anticompetitive behavior.
Qualcomm is at the European General Court fighting a 242 million euro ($259 million) fine for abusing its dominance in the chip market handed down by the EU, which claims Qualcomm sold chipsets below cost to illegally undercut competitors.
“Chronic mismanagement and blatant prosecutorial bias” is how Miguel Rato, one of Qualcomm’s lawyers, characterized the EU’s case against the company.
The investigation, which began in 2015, revealed potential antitrust violations occurring between 2009 and 2011. At the time, Brussels claims, Qualcomm was deeply concerned about startup rival Icera, which was producing the sets of electronic components for now nearly obsolete technology called “dongles” that allow tablets and laptops to connect to Wi-Fi.
Read more: US Chip Maker Qualcomm Asks EU Court To Overturn Antitrust Fine
The practice Qualcomm is accused of, known as predatory pricing, involves selling products at a steeply discounted price to block rivals from selling their own goods.
The European Commission asserts that over a span of several years, Qualcomm supplied an advanced chipset to the Chinese telecom companies ZTE and Huawei at a discounted cost. The two firms reportedly together made up over 50 percent of the chipset customer market.
Qualcomm contends this case has gone through numerous managers, causing hindrances due to delayed evidence and entropy. Additionally, ZTE is reported to have stated that it was unable to provide any more information concerning the sales as those previously entailed in the matter are no longer employed by the company.
“It is a great pity to conclude that ZTE cannot provide the information,” the partially state-owned company said in an email read out in court Monday by Qualcomm’s counsel.
Featured News
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Shein Faces EU Regulations Over User Data
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Fights Back Against US Antitrust Lawsuit
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
US Homeland Security Establishes Blue-Ribbon Board with Tech CEOs to Advise on AI
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Accuses Amazon Executives of Using Disappearing Messaging Apps to Conceal Evidence
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI