EU State Measures against Foreign Takeovers: “Economic Patriotism” in All but Name
Nelson Jung, Alex Nourry, Nov 01, 2006
This article examines the compatibility of special rights and other state measures with the EC´s single market objectives within the framework of the EC Treaty and their impact on foreign takeovers and investments. It also examines the initiatives taken by the Commission in order to eliminate such measures and analyzes the potential remedies available to foreign investors when confronted with such measures. Such remedies include the application of the Commission´s powers under Article 21 of the EC Merger Regulation that arguably could be used to even greater effect with the abolition or curtailment of the two-thirds rule.
Featured News
Mississippi Medical Board Faces Antitrust Challenge Over Nurse-Midwife Practice Rules
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Slaps Major Banks With $184 Million in Fines Over Mortgage Coordination
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Former FTC Litigator Appointed General Counsel of American Antitrust Institute
Jan 20, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Moves to Appeal Meta Antitrust Ruling Over Instagram and WhatsApp Acquisitions
Jan 20, 2026 by
CPI
Deutsche Boerse Nears €5.3 Billion Deal for Allfunds
Jan 20, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark & KaDee L. Ru