An appeal tribunal has told the UK’s competition regulator to reconsider its decision to block the takeover of Footasylum by JD Sports, claiming it failed to take sufficient account of the COVID-19 pandemic or the growth of brands selling direct to consumers, reported the Financial Times.
In a 93-page ruling published on Friday, November 13, the Competition Appeal Tribunal concluded that “the assessment of [Covid-19] effects is sufficiently material to the Competition and Markets Authority’s overall conclusions as to require further examination of the final report as a whole.”
It also upheld JD Sports’ view that the growth of direct-to-consumer businesses at sportswear giants Nike and Adidas, which accelerated during the pandemic, posed a competitive threat, saying that the CMA did not have evidence to rule otherwise.
“We therefore remit the case to the CMA for reconsideration in the light of this judgment,” it added.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Shein Faces EU Regulations Over User Data
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Fights Back Against US Antitrust Lawsuit
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
US Homeland Security Establishes Blue-Ribbon Board with Tech CEOs to Advise on AI
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Accuses Amazon Executives of Using Disappearing Messaging Apps to Conceal Evidence
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI