A PYMNTS Company

Parens Patriae Standing of Attorneys General: A Case of Mistaken Identity

By  |  August 26, 2019

By Jennifer L. Pratt

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    This article explores the standing of state attorneys general to bring actions to protect the quasi-sovereign interests of their states and citizenries. Known as parens patriae, this form of standing is unique to the sovereign and began as a strictly common law concept, but has been codified in state and federal statutes alike. The article explores the historical development of parens patriae, and the test for determining whether an asserted interest is “quasi-sovereign” as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc., v. Puerto Rico, 458 U.S. 592 (1982). The article concludes by offering some practical suggestions for avoiding the pitfalls that often arise when settlement negotiations – especially those arising out of antitrust cases and investigations – address the issue of parens patriae authority.

    Click here for the full article.