A PYMNTS Company

Personal Data, Exploitative Contracts, and Algorithmic Fairness: Autonomous Vehicles Meet the Internet of Things

 |  August 7, 2017

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Personal Data, Exploitative Contracts, and Algorithmic Fairness: Autonomous Vehicles Meet the Internet of Things

    By Philipp Hacker (European University Institute)

    Abstract:      Personal data harvested in the Internet of Things not only promises to be particularly valuable, but also particularly privacy-sensitive. Analysed with the power of specialized Artificial Intelligence, such data allows for potentially beneficial personalization of goods and services; however, it also facilitates data-driven exploitative contracting. For example, autonomous and connected vehicles (ACVs), epitomizing the merger of Artificial Intelligence with the Internet of Things, are collecting ever increasing amounts of personal data. From an economic perspective, the processing of this data by ACV operators is ambivalent, enabling innovative driving and safety features in a personalized version of autonomous driving, but also exploitative contracts tailored to profit from the vulnerabilities of data subjects. A key regulatory conundrum at the intersection of Artificial Intelligence with the Internet of Things therefore consists in facilitating socially beneficial innovation while reining in exploitative contracts. Current EU data protection, contract and tort law, however, arguably fail to rein in data-driven exploitative contracts. Therefore, three novel interventions aiming to infuse greater fairness into the code of the digital economy are discussed: (a) mandatory “data safe” alternatives; (b) personalized data protection; and (c) procedural rules on algorithmic fairness.

    Continue Reading…