The extent to which the PGA Tour’s legal battle with LIV Golf is about Saudi Arabia plays a starring role in new court filings.
On Nov. 22, attorneys representing the Public Investment Fund of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (PIF) and its governor, Yasir Othman Al-Rumayyan, moved to quash PGA Tour subpoenas that would require Al-Rumayyan to testify at depositions and to turn over sensitive documents.
The PGA Tour, PIF charges, intends to “burden” Al-Rumayyan with “unnecessary” requests as part of an effort to frame the dispute as more about the Saudi Arabian government than two golf leagues.
Related: PGA Tour Countersues LIV Golf In Escalating Antitrust Saga
Much of PIF’s argument before California federal judge Beth Lasbon Freeman is based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). This federal law generally makes foreign governments and leaders immune from lawsuits in U.S. courts. However, under FSIA’s “commercial activity” exception, a government and leader can face trial if a lawsuit is based on their regular course of commercial conduct and if there is a sufficient connection between that conduct and the U.S.
The PGA Tour maintains that PIF effectively controls LIV Golf and thus is subject to litigation and discovery requests. But PIF insists the commercial activity exception doesn’t apply because—as PIF attorneys tell it—the two leagues’ antitrust and contract claims have “nothing to do with PIF.”
To that end, PIF works hard to distinguish LIV from PIF, which was created by royal decree in 1971 to serve the public interest and promote “economic development in the Kingdom.” PIF objects to the tour’s use of the verb “control” since, PIF asserts, the fund doesn’t control LIV’s “day-to-day operations.” PIF admits that it recently opened an office in New York City but contends “the office has a skeletal crew and leases office space … PIF has no real estate or employees in the U.S.”
Featured News
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Shein Faces EU Regulations Over User Data
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Fights Back Against US Antitrust Lawsuit
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
US Homeland Security Establishes Blue-Ribbon Board with Tech CEOs to Advise on AI
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Accuses Amazon Executives of Using Disappearing Messaging Apps to Conceal Evidence
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI