A PYMNTS Company

Pragmatic, incremental approach is the best way to reform antitrust law

By  |  June 11, 2020

By Sam Bowman, The Hill

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The House Subcommittee on Antitrust, led by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), is expected to release its report on competition in digital markets in the coming weeks. Though focused on digital markets, its proposals may have far-reaching effects for the whole economy.

    While we cannot judge the report until it is out, there are signs that it may recommend dramatic changes to antitrust law that would nullify decades of judicial precedent, abandon antitrust’s focus on consumer wellbeing in favor of other goals, and move towards a guilty-until-proven-innocent standard in some antitrust cases that would require businesses to prove that their challenged conduct is legal. Cicilline’s recent endorsement of a near-blanket ban on mergers during the coronavirus shutdown suggests that he may be tempted by some of these proposals.

    Advocates argue that competition is weakening in America, pointing to rising market concentration – big businesses’ share of national markets – and recent studies that have shown a rise in markups, a measure of business profitability.

    Continue Reading…