Amelia Fletcher, Apr 19, 2007
Over the past few years, there has been a burgeoning literature on two-sided markets and economic understanding of such markets has improved hugely. Less attention has, however, been paid to how competition policy should be applied in two-sided markets. This short note does not attempt to provide a comprehensive analysis of this issue, but merely presents a brief comment on the implications of two-sided market theory for one possible abuse of a dominant position under Article 82 of the EC Treaty: predatory pricing.
Featured News
California Lawmakers Set to Take Up Expanded Antitrust Proposals After Commission Vote
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
Key Cybersecurity Measures Again Hang in Balance Amid Partial Government Shutdown
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
Banks Tighten Controls After Insider Fraud and Laundering Guilty Pleas
Feb 2, 2026 by
CPI
FTC Raises Antitrust Concerns About Law Firms’ Diversity Hiring Practices
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Judge Rejects Multibillion-Dollar Penalty Request in Google Privacy Case
Feb 1, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Hub-&-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
CPI
A Data Analytics Company as the Hub in a Hub-and-Spoke Cartel
Jan 26, 2026 by
Joseph Harrington
Hub and Spoke Cartels
Jan 26, 2026 by
Patrick Van Cayseele
Hub-and-Spoke Collusion or Vertical Exclusion? Identifying the Rim in Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracies
Jan 26, 2026 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz, Pedro Gonzaga, Laura Ildefonso & Albert Metz
The Algorithmic Middleman in a Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy: Divergent Court Decisions and the Expanding Patchwork of State and Local Regulations
Jan 26, 2026 by
Bradley C. Weber