Posted by Social Science Research Network
Price Discrimination as a Violation of the Sherman Act
By Ramsi Woodcock (Georgia State University)
Abstract: The advance of the information age promises to make it possible for producers to charge consumers tailored prices that extract maximum value from them, a practice known as perfect price discrimination. I show that price discrimination violates antitrust law when it is supported by conduct designed to prevent those to which a price discriminator charges low prices from undermining the scheme by reselling the product to those to whom the discriminator wishes to charge high prices. I show that such conduct is not protected by the right, recognized by antitrust, of a seller to refuse to deal with competitors, such as resellers, particularly when the remedy antitrust would impose is an order requiring nondiscrimination, instead of cessation of the exclusionary conduct.
Featured News
Biden Administration Unveils Measures to Tackle Healthcare Costs Through Competition
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
Australia’s to Probe Coles and Woolworths for Alleged Price Gouging
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
D.C. Attorney General Pushes to Revive Suit Accusing Amazon of Price-Fixing
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
Google Withdraws Appeal, Opening the Door for Indian Startups Against User Choice Billing System
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
U.S. Congress Delays Legislation on TikTok Amid National Security Concerns
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI