Benjamin Edelman, Julian Wright, Jan 30, 2015
In connecting buyers to sellers, some two-sided platforms require that sellers offer their lowest prices through the platform, disallowing lower prices for direct sales or sales through competing platforms. In this article, we explore the various contexts where such restrictions have arisen, then consider effects on competition, entry, and efficiency. Where there are plausible mitigating factors, such as efficiencies from platforms’ price restrictions, we explore those rationales and compare them to the harms. We identify a set of responses for competition policy, look at experiences to date, and suggest some future attempts to improve the functioning of these markets.
Featured News
Moves to Fast-Track European Satellite Rival to Musk’s SpaceX
Oct 15, 2026 by
CPI
US DOJ Threatens Antitrust Investigation Into ABA Law School Rules
Oct 15, 2026 by
CPI
Foley & Lardner Adds Former DOJ Antitrust Attorney in Washington
Oct 15, 2026 by
CPI
China Tightens Airline Competition Rules as Industry Losses Mount
Oct 15, 2026 by
CPI
Cartier Owner Richemont in Talks to Join De Beers Takeover Bid
Oct 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton