Benjamin Edelman, Julian Wright, Jan 30, 2015
In connecting buyers to sellers, some two-sided platforms require that sellers offer their lowest prices through the platform, disallowing lower prices for direct sales or sales through competing platforms. In this article, we explore the various contexts where such restrictions have arisen, then consider effects on competition, entry, and efficiency. Where there are plausible mitigating factors, such as efficiencies from platforms’ price restrictions, we explore those rationales and compare them to the harms. We identify a set of responses for competition policy, look at experiences to date, and suggest some future attempts to improve the functioning of these markets.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
House Committee Subpoenas Vanguard and Arjuna Capital in Antitrust Probe
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
IAG Seeks EU Antitrust Approval for Air Europa Buyout, Pledges Remedies
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
Google Antitrust Trial Shifts to Jury for Decision
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
Cigna Ends Acquisition Talks with Humana Amid Price Disagreement
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
Sen. Warren Accuses Apple of Profit-Driven Blocking Amid iMessage Access Controversy
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Right to Repair
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
States Do-it-Themselves: Amid Spotty Federal Enforcement, State Legislatures are Revamping Right-to-Repair Laws at an Unprecedented Pace
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
All Tied Up? The Evolving Consumer Protection Focus on Repair Restrictions
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
Right to Repair is Rooted in Antitrust Law
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI
Right to Repair: A Case Study for the Maturation of a Regulatory Issue
Dec 11, 2023 by
CPI