Samsung Electronics, Micron Technology, and SK Hynix escaped antitrust litigation Monday over their alleged scheme to fix the price of dynamic random access memory, when a federal appeals court in San Francisco rejected the case’s consumer claims, reported Bloomberg Law.
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a ruling by Judge Jeffrey S. White, who found in 2020 that a coordinated conspiracy to curtail DRAM production was no more plausible an explanation for rising prices than parallel strategies adopted by similar businesses in a concentrated market.
In the semiconductor world, memory chips are unique. They’re made to industry standards, meaning that a product from one company can be replaced with one from a rival without changing anything else in the computer or phone they go into. That means the chips have been treated like commodities in secondary markets. And, like commodities, the price swings have been dramatic, often leading to gluts where chips sell for less than the cost of production.
Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix and Micron Technology — companies that together have market value of more than half a trillion dollars — are the last remaining contenders in a sector of the global semiconductor market that has proven to be particularly vulnerable to the volatile rises and falls in demand.
High-end chips have endured such a roller-coaster of value in recent years, being hit by increased demand as well as supply-chain disruptions. High-capacity chips are also considered essential for the development of the next iteration of the Internet, being necessary for handling the large data volumes made possible by 5G technologies.
Featured News
UK Probes Lindab’s Acquisition of HAS-Vent Amid Fears of Market Monopoly
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Shein Faces EU Regulations Over User Data
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Google Fights Back Against US Antitrust Lawsuit
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
US Homeland Security Establishes Blue-Ribbon Board with Tech CEOs to Advise on AI
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
FTC Accuses Amazon Executives of Using Disappearing Messaging Apps to Conceal Evidence
Apr 28, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI