Yong Huang and Xin Zhang, March 20, 2016
On March 20, 2013, the Higher People’s Court of Guangdong Province gave its judgment on the case of abuse of market dominance of Beijing Qihoo Technology Co., Ltd. (“Qihoo”) vs. Tencent Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. (collectively referred to as “Tencent”) and dismissed all the plaintiff’s claims. On October 8, 2014, the Supreme People’s Court made a second trial on the case and held that in the first instance judgment the facts ascertained were basically true, the application of law was correct and the trial result was appropriate, thereby it judged to reject the appeal and maintained the original verdict.
Featured News
US Judge Allows Consumer Antitrust Case Against Google to Move Forward
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
AI Developers Avoid Details in Initial Training Data Disclosures Under California Statute
Jan 22, 2026 by
CPI
EU Set to Review Rival Netflix and Paramount Skydance Bids for Warner Bros. Discovery
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Judge Tosses Drug Pricing Conspiracy Case Against CVS, UnitedHealth, Evernorth
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
House Panel Alleges CVS Used Contracts to Suppress Pharmacy Competition
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Recidivism
Jan 21, 2026 by
CPI
Recidivism, Multiple Offending, and Serial Offending in Antitrust
Jan 21, 2026 by
Gregory Werden
Antitrust Recidivism: Why Repeat Cases Appear, and Why True Reoffending Is Rare in the United States
Jan 21, 2026 by
Lisa M. Phelan, Megan S. Golden, Adrienne Irmer & Nina Worth
99 Antitrust Problems – Is Recidivism One?
Jan 21, 2026 by
Brian A. Ratner & Kartik S. Madiraju
Holding A Cat by the Tail: A View of Cartel Recidivism in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 21, 2026 by
Mark & KaDee L. Ru