Jean Tirole, Apr 01, 2005
This primer analyzes factors that make ties more likely either to hurt or to benefit consumers. It first identifies factors that influence where the impact of tying on competition in the tied market stands, ranging from little impact on the rivals’ ability to compete to total exclusion of competitors. Then, after reviewing anticompetitive and efficiency-enhancing motives for tying, it argues that tying should be submitted to a rule of reason standard. Furthermore, tying should not be a distinct offense but considered as one possible mechanism of predation. Like many other corporate strategies that make one’s products attractive to consumers, tying has the potential of hurting competitors, and, therefore, is just one in a large range of strategies that can be employed to prey on them. Finally, the primer discusses the costs and benefits of adopting a predation-based standard.
Links to Full Content
Featured News
Biden Administration Unveils Measures to Tackle Healthcare Costs Through Competition
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
Australia’s to Probe Coles and Woolworths for Alleged Price Gouging
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
D.C. Attorney General Pushes to Revive Suit Accusing Amazon of Price-Fixing
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
Google Withdraws Appeal, Opening the Door for Indian Startups Against User Choice Billing System
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
U.S. Congress Delays Legislation on TikTok Amid National Security Concerns
Dec 7, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI