
By Alexander Krzepicki, Joshua D. Wright & John M. Yun
In current antitrust policy debates, it is almost a foregone conclusion that digital platforms’ collection and use of “big data” is a barrier to entry. In this article, we argue that big data should properly be considered a two-stage process. The reason why this classification matters is because it allows us to link big data to concepts that antitrust is already familiar with: economies of scale, learning by doing, and research & development. By linking big data with the familiar, we hope to avoid a common tendency in antitrust to condemn the strange.
Featured News
Beijing Court Upholds Copyright in Landmark Decision on AI-Generated Images
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Price-Fixing Scandal Rocks European Construction Giants in US Court
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Google Ad Chief Jerry Dischler Steps Down Amid Antitrust Scrutiny
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Meta’s Ad-Free Subscription Service Faces EU Legal Challenge
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
UK Court Empowers Antitrust Watchdog to Probe Apple’s Dominance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Horizontal Competition: Mergers, Innovation & New Guidelines
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Innovation in Merger Control
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Making Sense of EU Merger Control: The Need for Limiting Principles
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Sustainability Agreements in the EU: New Paths to Competition Law Compliance
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI
Merger Control and Sustainability: A New Dawn or Nothing New Under the Sun?
Nov 30, 2023 by
CPI