A PYMNTS Company

Trademark Exhaustion and Its Interface with EU Competition Law

By  |  May 16, 2016

Posted by Social Science Research Network

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Trademark Exhaustion and Its Interface with EU Competition Law

    Apostolos Chronopoulos & Spyros M. Maniatis (University of London)
    Abstract:       The paper traces the evolution of the exhaustion doctrine in EU trademark law and examines its dialectic with the treatment of vertical restraints under EU competition law.

    From a rigid rule not allowing the trademark proprietor to control the further commercialization of a trademarked good after its initial sale, the exhaustion doctrine in the EU has gradually developed to complex set of sub-rules balancing the diverse interests of traders, parallel importers, and the consuming public in a manner that resembles market regulation through unfair competition norms. In similar vein, the doctrine of exhaustion should encompass the potential benefits of post-sale restraints. The paper contains a critical analysis of the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH [2015] EWCA CIV 54.