PYMNTS.com

United Kingdom

Visa, Mastercard and Revolut Lose UK Battle Over Interchange Fees

Read This

Payment Declines Hit Gen Z Harder Than Any Other Generation

Read This

UK Plans Steep Increases in Funding for AI Research

Read This

US Puts Tech Deal With UK on Hold

Read This

Visa, Mastercard and Revolut Lose UK Battle Over Interchange Fees

Visa, Mastercard and Revolut lost a fight over a proposed transaction fee cap in the United Kingdom.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The High Court in London ruled Thursday (Jan. 15) that the U.K.’s Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) has the right to set a price cap for cross-border interchange fees, the Financial Times (FT) reported Thursday.

    The ruling came despite lobbying from European banks and FinTechs, the report said. Visa and Revolut filed a judicial review last year against the PSR, contending the regulator had overstepped its authority and was hurting competition.

    Neither Visa nor Mastercard responded to PYMNTS’ request for comment. A spokesperson for Revolut declined to comment.

    The PSR first proposed the cap in 2023 after seeing that interchange fees for cross-border online payments had increased more than fivefold since Brexit, the FT report said.

    The fees are levied when a consumer from one country buys something from a merchant in another. The dispute was centered on card-not-present transactions, like online purchases, according to the report.

    Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

    The PSR’s findings showed that Visa and Mastercard increased interchange fees for online transactions between the European Union and the U.K. to 1.15% for debit cards and 1.5% for credit cards from 2021 to 2022, the report said.

    “In this market review, we have provisionally found that the fees charged by Mastercard and Visa to U.K. businesses which accept payments from within the EEA are likely too high,” Chris Hemsley, who was the PSR’s managing director at the time, said in a Dec. 13, 2023, press release. “In short, at this stage, we do not think this market is working well.”

    Visa has said it disagrees with the PSR’s findings. A spokesperson for Mastercard told PYMNTS in 2024 that “artificial controls” on the interchange fees “do not reflect the commercial reality of today’s market and, if not set at the right level, can negatively impact the value people and businesses receive from card payments.”

    Mastercard and Visa do not collect interchange fees but rather serve as intermediaries in transactions, the FT report said. But the High Court’s judgement said both companies are indirectly impacted by price caps because these fees offer an incentive for banks to use their services.

    The court’s judgment came days after President Donald Trump’s call to cap credit card interest rates at 10% led to pushback from the banking and payments sector.

    Payment Declines Hit Gen Z Harder Than Any Other Generation

    Forget “access denied.” “Payment declined” is Gen Z’s new refrain.

      Get the Full Story

      Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

      yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

      By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

      Whether it’s at Dollar General, Whole Foods or somewhere in between, most Americans don’t experience the unpleasantness of getting dinged when trying to check out for their purchase. But for adult consumers roughly age 18-29 this year, declined payments have become a routine frustration. One in 4 Gen Zers report that a purchase they tried to make on their credit card, debit card or digital wallet was rejected in the past month. The average amount: $263, the most of any generational cohort, and five times the $53 for boomers and seniors.

       

      For the latest edition of the “How People Shop and Pay” report, PYMNTS Intelligence surveyed 2,108 U.S. adult consumers during the final weeks of November and first week of December. On average, nearly 1 in 7, or 15%, of all consumers experienced a payment decline during the past 30 days, the height of the holiday shopping season. The 1-in-4 ding rate for Gen Z shoppers mean they’re two-thirds more likely than the average shopper (and about six times as likely as the typical baby boomer) to see their payment not go through.

       

       

      Overall, 7% of consumers suffered a payment decline on their last grocery or retail purchase over late November to early December. Nearly 1 in 6, or 17%, saw their payment rejected at Amazon Whole Foods. Some 12% shopping for groceries at Dollar General were dinged, as were 4% trying to pay for non-grocery items. Nearly 1 in 10 Walmart shoppers had a payment declined.

       

       

      ‘No sale’

      Regardless of how they tried to pay, the “no sale” verdict could have materialized for a number of reasons. The most obvious one is insufficient funds in the bank to cover a purchase by debit card. That roadblock is behind 27% of all payment declines, including 4 in 10 rejections for boomers. Curiously, that trips up fewer than 2 in 10 (18%) Gen Zers, even though they often have entry-level. lower-paying jobs. Instead, the youngest adult shoppers encounter different trip wires.

      Because they’re early in their professional careers and still building their credit profiles, Gen Zers may have lower spending limits on their credit cards and exceed them when trying but failing to check out that new sofa. They’re more than twice as likely as boomers to say their last payment decline was because they didn’t have enough available to spend on their credit card.

      Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

      The most recent Federal Reserve data shows that revolving balances, most of credit card debt but also personal loans and home equity revolving lines of credit (HELOCs) slipped 1.9% last November to $1.3 trillion.

       

       

      Being young has another potential drawback when it comes to spending and paying.

      Because many Gen Zers don’t have a long-term track record of paying on time and are just starting to build credit records with Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, financial institutions may be more likely to flag some of their transactions as high risk.

      Findings from the “FICO® Score Credit Insights Report” showed that Gen Z saw the biggest year-over-year credit score drop of any generation, with student loan debt proving to be a big financial burden. This month, the Department of Education began garnishing up to 15% of wages of some borrowers in default, crimping budgets and harming credit scores. The average Gen Z credit score is 676, below the national average of 715. Both are “goodbut below the “prime” designation that to higher credit limits and lower interest rates.

       

       

      Sketchy Purchases?

      Meanwhile, nearly 3 in 10 consumers in the PYMNTS survey said their last retail payment didn’t go through was because the bank flagged the transaction as suspicious. Equally as many said their payment was declined because the financial institution behind their card deemed the purchase “unusually large” based on their spending habits.

      What’s ironic is that while Gen Zers are relatively good at taking steps to bolster their financial literacy, they’re sometimes clueless about the basic mechanics. PYMNTS Intelligence’s “Gen Z Decoder Ring” finds that nearly two-thirds of them took advantage in childhood and early adulthood of resources to improve their financial literacy (versus 41% of boomers). Plus, 85% of Gen Zers saved up for big-ticket expenses when they were kids, demonstrating their forward-looking approach to finances.

      But even the digital-native generation, which has never known a world without the internet and keyboards, can sloppy. Nearly 3 in 10 (27%) whose recent payment was declined wound up with that result because they incorrectly entered their PIN or other payment details. Only 8% of boomers and Gen Z with payment declines messed up that bit.

      When retail payments are declined, digital wallets are increasingly where the rejection happens. Thirty-one percent of declines last November were for payments made through digital wallets, more than twice the rate since last February. Meanwhile, decline rates for physical credit and debit cards fell over that same period, highlighting how digital wallets — apps on mobile phones, tablets or computers that store debit and credit card credentials, along with event tickets and boarding passes — are capturing a bigger share of the retail payments industry.

      But regardless of an owner’s annual household income, digital wallets trigger more declines due to the bank flagging suspicious activity than credit or debit cards. That may signal either that wallets are bigger gateway to fraud, or that the banks and service providers behind them are erroneously flagging some legitimate transactions as bogus.

       

      People under “high financial stress,” defined as experiencing cash shortfalls for living or emergency expenses in the last 90 days, are the most likely to use digital wallets to buy groceries and other retail products. With tighter pocketbooks, they’re the most likely to bump up against payment declines due to insufficient funds.

       

       

      That 50% increase is far greater than the population-wide rise in payment declines. In the same period (November 2024 to November 2025), the share of consumers who’d had a payment declined in the last month only rose 15%. 

       

      These payment declines aren’t just an issue for consumers. They also lead to reduced sales for merchants, especially if payments are falsely flagged. The latest edition of PYMNTS Intelligence’s “Payments Orchestration Tracker®” cited findings that nearly half of all merchants — 47% — estimate that up to 5% of legitimate orders are wrongly dinged as fraudulent, leading to an estimated $50 billion in revenue losses all.

      Plus, it can hurt merchants’ customer retention. PYMNTS Intelligence research finds that the same share (47%) of retailers say false declines have a very or extremely negative impact on customer satisfaction.

      Read more:

      Latest Government Credit Data Signals a Reset and Resilience

      The New Checkout: Crimped Consumers Lean Into Online Retail and Digital Wallets

      Buy Now, Pay Later Powers the Experience Economy

      At PYMNTS Intelligence, we work with businesses to uncover insights that fuel intelligent, data-driven discussions on changing customer expectations, a more connected economy and the strategic shifts necessary to achieve outcomes. With rigorous research methodologies and unwavering commitment to objective quality, we offer trusted data to grow your business. As our partner, you’ll have access to our diverse team of PhDs, researchers, data analysts, number crunchers, subject matter veterans and editorial experts.

      UK Plans Steep Increases in Funding for AI Research

      The British government is reportedly planning sharp funding increases for areas like artificial intelligence (AI) and video games.

        Get the Full Story

        Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

        yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

        By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

        That spending could increase by up to 100% in some areas as the U.K.’s  research funding agency reconfigures its budget to boost the economy, the Financial Times (FT) reported Wednesday (Dec. 17).

        Sir Ian Chapman, chief executive of UK Research and Innovation, rated his agency only “three out of 10” in fostering growth and told the FT he wants to shift more funding to areas prioritized by government ministers.

        The government has pledged a 14% increase in research spending by 2029-30, to a yearly total of 10 billion pounds ($13.4 billion), and Chapman told the FT the he aims to put “pretty much all” of the increase into projects that offered the potential to boost growth. Of that spending, 1.6 billion pounds ($2.1 billion) will go to AI over four years.

        Increases were “between 50% and 100%” for the priority areas, Chapman said, with the largest proportional increase going to the creative industries. That space will get 369 million pounds ($494 million) as the government looks to boost areas like film, music and video games.

        Chapman added this last sector was a “big, significant global market,” with the U.K. “home to a number of extremely successful” companies.

        Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

        “There is a lot of underpinning high tech in that, and so innovation and research can really drive you to higher quality products,” he added. “We’re going to go after that.”

        In other AI news, PYMNTS CEO Karen Webster on Wednesday made the case for the chatbot as 2025’s “Person of the Year.”

        Each month, she noted, 1.8 billion people worldwide talk with the AI models from companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and Perplexity.

        And recently released PYMNTS Intelligence data shows that more than half the U.S. population now relies on these platforms as more than just a search alternative.

        “They are using them to manage the real tasks across what I coined as the pillars of the connected economy back in January of 2020,” Webster wrote. “The activities that are the infrastructure of everyday modern life. How people shop, pay, live, work, eat, stay well, have fun, travel, communicate, and bank.”

        The research finds 30 million “power users” turning to their chatbot for 25 or more of the 54 activities that make up these connected economy pillars. More than 80% of this group employs chatbots for shopping discovery, daily planning, learning, or health and wellness.

        “In just three short years, more likely in just the last 12 months, they’ve rewired their entire digital footprint around these conversational interfaces,” Webster wrote.

        US Puts Tech Deal With UK on Hold

        The United States government reportedly paused its technology deal with the United Kingdom.

          Get the Full Story

          Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

          yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

          By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

          The suspension of the “technology prosperity deal” comes amid rising frustration in Washington over the progress of trade discussions with the U.K., the Financial Times reported Monday (Dec. 15).

          The deal, announced in September during President Donald Trump’s trip to the U.K., is designed to promote collaboration between the countries on artificial intelligence, nuclear energy and quantum computing, according to the report.

          The U.S. suspended the deal last week, the report said, citing unnamed U.K. officials. The White House is lobbying for concessions from the U.K. on trade areas beyond the scope of the agreement, formed in response to tariffs on U.K. goods.

          The U.S. became frustrated with the lack of willingness from the U.K. to deal with “non-tariff barriers,” such as rules and regulations on food and industrial goods, the report said, citing unnamed sources.

          Although the U.K. agreed to allow 13,000 tons of U.S. beef to enter the country free of tariffs each year, the trade deal said the two sides would continue to work together to improve market access for more U.S. agricultural products, according to the report.

          Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

          The U.S. has for years pushed the U.K. to recognize American food and agricultural product standards, although there were no specific commitments included in the deal, per the report.

          Meanwhile, Trump has criticized the digital services tax imposed on tech companies by U.S. trading partners. However, one U.K. official denied that this tax, which affects American tech companies, was a serious issue, according to the report.

          “The digital services tax is a red herring,” the official said, per the report. “We are down to negotiating some of the most difficult issues. Both sides expect this to take some time. But the dialogue remains open, active and constructive.”

          The trade deal was accompanied by a $1.6 billion investment from financial companies, including PayPal, Bank of America and Citigroup, with commitments to create 1,800 jobs in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

          “Strengthening ties with the U.S. boosts our economy, creates jobs and secures our role in global finance, delivering on our Plan for Change,” U.K. Business and Trade Secretary Peter Kyle said in September. “These investments reflect the strength of our enduring ‘golden corridor’ with one of our closest trading partners, ahead of the U.S. presidential state visit.”