PYMNTS.com

United Kingdom

Coinbase’s $667 Million Loss Snaps Eight-Quarter Profitability Streak

Read This

Credit Unions Take Stakes in FinTechs to Control the Roadmap

Read This

Mastercard Launches Accreditation Program for UK FinTech Sponsors

Read This

Google May Offer Publishers More Options to Control AI’s Use of Content

Read This

Coinbase’s $667 Million Loss Snaps Eight-Quarter Profitability Streak

The digital asset economy’s early growth was driven primarily by speculative trading. It still is today.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    And while the industry has been trying to break away from its reliance on that growth engine, the crypto exchange Coinbase’s fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings announced Thursday (Feb. 12) show that there still is some way to go.

    Coinbase reported a fourth-quarter loss of $667 million, driven largely by markdowns tied to its crypto investment portfolio and strategic holding. Fourth quarter revenue sank an estimated 20%.

    The latest results snapped the crypto exchange’s profitability streak of eight quarters.

    But executives on Thursday’s earnings call chose to highlight the crypto platform’s diversification plays, stressing that the digital asset industry’s next phase will be tied to payments, financing and programmable financial services, particularly as bitcoin drops to record lows and trading volumes cool.

    “There’s no company in the world that wants to pay more money for moving their money,” said Brian Armstrong, co-founder and CEO, highlighting Coinbase’s push into both stablecoins and institutionally driven products.

    Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

    “The Everything Exchange is working,” added Armstrong. “In 2025, we drove all-time highs across our products: Coinbase One subscriptions reached ~1 million, trading volume and market share doubled, and USDC held on platform reached an all-time high.”

    See also: Robinhood Feels Chill as Crypto Slump Cools Revenue   

    Coinbase Wants to Build Its Way Out

    Despite the disappointing quarter for Coinbase and the fact that its stock is down around 40% year-to-date, activity on the platform expanded sharply during the full year. Per the company’s financials, total trading volume reached $5.2 trillion in 2025, up 156% year over year, while Coinbase’s share of global crypto trading doubled to 6.4%.

    But despite leadership stressing that they see the current bear market as an opportunity to build and buy on the cheap, executives also returned repeatedly to the fact that Coinbase does not intend to continue to see its revenues rise and fall with crypto market sentiment. Central to Coinbase’s growth strategy is what leadership described as an “asset accumulation flywheel” of earning customer trust, attracting assets onto the platform, and layering services around those balances.

    That’s the foundational concept behind Armstrong’s “everything exchange.”

    To that end, assets held on Coinbase have tripled over the past three years, and the company estimates that more than 12% of global crypto was stored on its platform in 2025. This concentration allows Coinbase to monetize through staking, lending and payments rather than relying solely on transaction fees.

    Stablecoins, particularly Circle’s USDC, have become foundational to Coinbase’s ecosystem. Per its financials, average USDC balances held within Coinbase products have reached $17.8 billion.

    See also: While US Debates Stablecoin Yield, Europe and Asia Set Clearer Rules 

    Still, reinventing a trading platform as a financial ecosystem is capital intensive. Coinbase’s operating expenses rose 35% year over year to $5.7 billion, driven by acquisitions, regulatory investments, marketing programs, and infrastructure development tied to its expanded vision.

    And while Coinbase views the current phase of the crypto cycle as a build period rather than a harvest period, as regulatory clarity improves globally, competitors are also evolving. Traditional exchanges, FinTech companies, and decentralized platforms are all expanding into overlapping territory, from tokenized assets to crypto custody and derivatives.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence and Citi report “Chain Reaction: Regulatory Clarity as the Catalyst for Blockchain Adoption” found that blockchain’s next leap will be shaped by regulation; that evolving guidance is beginning to create the foundations for safe, scalable blockchain adoption; and that implementation challenges continue to complicate progress.

    In the United States, however, lawmaker gridlock around key stablecoin yield questions has left crypto market legislation in limbo. The debate has reached such a crescendo that Citi analysts have noted the growing chance that the CLARITY Act’s passage could be delayed beyond 2026, although there is also a chance it may still pass this year.

    Coinbase has played a background role in the debate, with Armstrong frequently heading to Washington.

     

    Credit Unions Take Stakes in FinTechs to Control the Roadmap

    Michael Abraham, the chief strategy officer of Great Lakes Credit Union (GLCU), spotted a flaw in how his $2.4 trillion industry had done business for decades.

      Get the Full Story

      Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

      yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

      By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

      Most credit unions don’t have the dollars, expertise or manpower to develop essential tools like digital wallets and artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots on their own, let alone to modernize their decades-old underwriting and fraud detection systems. So for years, when they needed a basic app or better software for mortgage data, they hired an advisor or wrote a check to a financial technology company, often a Silicon Valley startup. Those providers collected fees and left, often leaving a disjointed pile of software and systems that didn’t work smoothly together.

      Abraham’s thought: What if his credit union set up an independent arm to invest in FinTechs and buy or license their financial services tools, “almost like a private equity sandbox?”

      Credit unions sometimes join a consortium known as a credit union service organization, or CUSO, pooling their funds to invest in FinTechs, working closely with their developers and buying their digital tools, usually with a discount. More typically, like GLCU, they set up a solo CUSO.

      A $1.4 billion institution serving northern Illinois and western Indiana, GLCU created a new holding company in 2023 to house its prior CUSO investments and FinTech partnerships, including with Interface.ai, a startup that several years earlier rolled out a consumer-facing artificial intelligence agent called “Olive” for the credit union. Last December, the new entity invested in LetMeDoIt, a financial planning app for people with disabilities, a 45-million-strong market Abraham called underserved.

      The solo CUSO allows us to more easily “manage and deploy funds” set aside for investment, Abraham, the new entity’s CEO, said. It also has a board and employees dedicated to evaluating and deploying investment funds, “versus those items being part of someone’s job at the CU as an aside.”

      Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

      The Credit Union-FinTech Love Story

      More than 8 in 10 credit unions have less than $500 million in assets (JPMorgan Chase, the nation’s largest bank, has $3.9 trillion in assets worldwide and spends $2 billion a year on AI alone). That makes partnering with FinTechs—hiring them, investing in them and sometimes buying them—the credit union industry’s path to not just growth, but survival.

      “Anything that automates any and absolutely every part of the process we work on is top of the list,” said Christine Blake, the CEO of Cardinal Credit Union. “Also, better member experience.”

      Cardinal worked with Velera, a payments-focused CUSO, and Lumin Digital, a Velera-backed startup, to launch a new online banking platform in 2024, with personalized financial recommendations, a finance-tracking dashboard, real-time payments, automatic transfers and a real-time chat function with a live person. The credit union just tasked 10 employees with brainstorming use cases for AI and deciding in the next 12 months or sooner whether to partner with a FinTech or build in house, Blake said.

      Recent data from PYMNTS Intelligence shows that more than half of credit unions say FinTech partnerships help them innovate at a much faster pace or bigger scale than what they could do internally—more than double March 2025’s level. Two in three say FinTech partners will power their mobile and digital payments within the next three years. Only 0.6% say they can innovate without the help of a FinTech.

       

      They’re not Wall Street banks with giant technology budgets, but the nation’s more than 4,300 credit unions collectively hold $2.4 trillion in assets and serve 145 million individuals and businesses (called members because they have an ownership stake in the institutions). If they’re to survive, credit unions need chatbots, agents, better fraud-detection tools and cards with integrated rewards as much as the big banks do, especially for their Gen Z customers.

      But there’s more than one way the credit union-FinTech love story can unfold.

      ‘Innovator’s Dilemma’

      Nadim Homsany has sat on both sides of the table. Now the head of AI and innovation at the $33 billion Boeing Employees Credit Union, soon to have $33 billion in assets when its merger with SAFE Credit Union closes, he was a co-founder and CEO of EarnUp, a venture capital-backed platform that automates consumers’ debt payments. Last July, BECU acquired the platform’s generative AI technology and team to roll out mobile and digital debt management tools for BECU’s more-than-1.5 million members.

      Homsany, a former McKinsey consultant, wanted to avoid the so-called “Innovator’s Dilemma,” when an organization’s size and bureaucracy—Seattle-headquartered BECU is the nation’s fourth-largest credit union—stymies the speed and disruption startups bring.

      So he built a moat within BECU around EarnUp’s gen AI technology.

      “We need to incubate it in an insulated part of the organization, so it doesn’t get caught up in the rest of the organization,” Homsany said.

      Inside that protected bubble, Homsany’s team began using the acquired technology to build “Becca,” an AI financial adviser aimed at middle-income savers and the 67% of Americans living paycheck to paycheck.

      Other credit unions effectively team up to date FinTechs. In October 2024, North Carolina-based Coastal Credit Union joined a CUSO formed by Prizeout, a FinTech with cash back, digital gift cards and rewards programs for financial institutions. By investing in the Prizeout Partners CUSO, more than 40 credit unions and related organizations typically receive a 20% discount on licensing the startup’s technology.

      “What we learned here at Coastal was that one is we can’t afford to staff and manage development,” said T. J. Wyman, the chief digital services officer at Coastal Credit Union, a $6 billion institution. “So if we’re not going to do that, we’ve got to find partners.”

      Today, it manages a portfolio of roughly $20 million, spread across investments in more than a dozen startups via a separate investing arm. Coastal doesn’t have to hire the developers; it just owns a piece of the companies that do.

      Who Wears the Pants?

      Most FinTech partnerships focus on improving what’s already in place. More than six in 10 credit unions work with FinTechs to bolt new features onto existing products, PYMNTS data shows. Nearly two in three introduce new service channels or delivery capabilities for existing products and services.

       

      Prizeout’s CUSO allows its roughly two dozen credit unions and related organizations to integrate cash back, rewards and other loyalty features directly into their existing systems. Because the credit unions invested dollars in Prizeout, they get a say in how its technology is built. When one credit union complained recently that its existing rewards programs weren’t tailored to the industry, Prizeout built a “rewards on a credit card swipe” feature to fill the gap.

      “We have a round table twice a year with our partners where we talk about, hey, what are your challenges? What are you looking for? How do we inform our roadmap to build things?” Prizeout Co-founder and Chief Strategy Officer Matt Denham said. “They get to come to our round tables and obviously influence where we’re going.”

      Blake Woods, a senior vice president of strategic transformation at the $1.5 billion orsa credit union in Michigan, said credit unions could drive FinTechs, not the other way around.

      “You might gain a board seat or sit on an advisory board for said FinTech if you make a certain level of investment, so you get to help steer the company,” Woods said.

      He said orsa was making an undisclosed investment in Larky, a startup that makes push notifications. Orsa members at, say, a Detroit Lions football game will receive mobile alerts for Orsa products whose rates rise 25 basis points when the team scores a touchdown.

      The Tortoise and the Hare

      Unsurprisingly, for an industry known for friendly in-person service, lower borrowing costs and higher interest rates on certificates of deposit, the pillar of credit unions is high touch, high service. This creates a challenge in preserving that community feel in an era of agentic AI.

      The marriage between the “move fast” culture of FinTechs and the “safety first” ethos of credit unions is rarely smooth.

      Sometimes, it starts with a pitch that sounds too good to be true. Abraham recalled a time when a FinTech entrepreneur pitched him a solution for sharing mortgage data between the bank’s core system and third parties.

      Functionally, it was perfect.

      But when the credit union’s team looked under the hood to see how the software was built, the deal collapsed. The entrepreneur had built the code in his basement, likely using off-the-shelf AI tools like ChatGPT or Claude, without the rigorous infrastructure required to protect sensitive personal data.

      “The infrastructure that was built on had no real ability to demonstrate data integrity … It wouldn’t meet the minimum barrier regulatory scrutiny,” Abraham said. “That’s kind of a non-starter.”

      There’s also a timing disconnect.

      Credit unions operate on annual budget cycles and consensus-building. In contrast, FinTech startups live on a runway measured in months.

      Prizeout’s Denham said that while a typical software sales cycle might be six to nine months, credit unions often approve new spending only once a year, in October or November. If a startup misses that window, they’re often told to wait until next year.

      Only 22% of FinTechs say their innovation projects for credit unions go according to timeline, according to PYMNTS Intelligence. Coastal’s Wyman said it talked to Prizeout “for the better part of two years” before joining its CUSO. Said Cardinal’s Woods: “FinTechs don’t realize the depth of regulatory and compliance issues until they start working with a credit union.”

      Mastercard Launches Accreditation Program for UK FinTech Sponsors

      Mastercard has introduced a new accreditation framework designed to streamline market entry for financial-technology startups in the United Kingdom, according to a Jan. 15 press release.

        Get the Full Story

        Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

        yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

        By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

        The initiative, titled “BIN Sponsor Plus,” aims to connect FinTechs and other businesses with a vetted network of financial institutions capable of facilitating rapid card program launches.

        Bank Identification Number (BIN) sponsorship is a critical mechanism in the digital economy, allowing non-bank entities to access global payment networks without the regulatory and administrative overhead of becoming a licensed issuer. Under the new program, approved sponsors must adhere to enhanced standards regarding due diligence and training. In return, these partners receive specialized operational support and a “Partner Mark” from Mastercard signifying their accreditation.

        The program launches with four founding participants: Transact Pay, PSI Pay, IDT Financial Services and Edenred Payment Solutions.

        Darren Deal, Mastercard’s senior vice president for FinTech, government and digital partnerships, stated that the program provides a “ready-made list of best-in-class partners” to help companies scale efficiently. The sponsorship model has previously served as a launchpad for major U.K. challengers, including Monzo, Starling and Revolut, which utilized sponsors before becoming direct Mastercard issuers.

        The initiative arrives as the U.K. solidifies its status as a global FinTech hub, with the sector generating 32.4 billion pounds ($45 billion) in revenue in 2024 and ranking as the second-largest market globally for funding.

        Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

        The U.K. initiative aligns with a broader global framework Mastercard is implementing to formalize the complex web of relationships behind digital wallets and cards.

        In a related industry analysis, the payments network highlighted the necessity of new oversight structures to manage the risk associated with non-bank issuers. While BINs have routed transactions and identified issuers since the 1970s, most FinTechs lack the regulatory status to manage them directly, making sponsorship essential for market access.

        Rich Audet, Mastercard’s vice president of franchise customer enablement, emphasized that the updated guidelines are intended to “fuel new growth without compromising on our ability to manage and mitigate risk.”

        This focus on transparency seeks to define clear roles for all parties, preventing operational fallout for sponsor banks and consumers should a startup fail. The urgency for robust standards is underscored by the sector’s rapid expansion; citing data from Boston Consulting Group, Mastercard noted that global FinTech revenues climbed 21% in the last year alone.

        Google May Offer Publishers More Options to Control AI’s Use of Content

        Google faces potential new regulations covering its search services in the United Kingdom and, in separate news, reportedly agreed to settle a proposed class action lawsuit in the United States involving its operating system for smartphones.

          Get the Full Story

          Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

          yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

          By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

          Potential measures announced Wednesday (Jan 28) would see the U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) impose new rules covering Google’s search services.

          The CMA’s proposed measures would provide content publishers more choice and clarity over how their content is used in Google’s AI Overviews; ensure the tech giant ranks search results fairly, including those in its AI Overviews and AI Mode; make it easier for users of Android smartphones and the Chrome browser to switch search services; and make it easier for people and businesses to use Google search data, the regulator said in a Wednesday press release.

          “These targeted and proportionate actions would give U.K. businesses and consumers more choice and control over how they interact with Google’s search services — as well as unlocking greater opportunities for innovation across the U.K. tech sector and broader economy,” CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell said in the release. “They would also provide a fairer deal for content publishers, particularly news organizations, over how their content is used in Google’s AI Overviews.”

          In a blog post addressing the CMA’s announcement, Ron Eden, principal, product management at Google, said the company will engage with the regulator’s process and will continue working with website owners and other stakeholders on this topic.

          Eden also highlighted controls Google already provides to web publishers, noting that some of the controls also apply to AI Overviews and Google’s training of its Gemini AI models.

          Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

          “We’re optimistic we can find a path forward that provides even more choice to website owners and publishers, while ensuring people continue to get the most helpful and innovative Search experience possible,” Eden said in the post.

          In other news, in the proposed settlement reported on Wednesday, Google will pay $135 million to resolve allegations that its Android operating system collected smartphone users’ cellular data without their permission, Reuters reported. The settlement requires a judge’s approval.

          The plaintiffs alleged that Google collected cellular data to support its product development and its targeted advertising campaigns, according to the report.

          In the proposed settlement, Google denied wrongdoing. The deal requires a $135 million payout as well as the company’s agreement to not transfer data without Android users’ consent, make it easier for users to stop the transfers, and disclose the transfers in its Google Play terms of service, per the report.