A PYMNTS Company

20 Major Law Firms Prepare Defense In Antitrust Case Against Universities

By  |  February 27, 2022

Nearly 20 major law firms are preparing to coordinate their defenses as they contest an antitrust lawsuit in Illinois federal court alleging a group of top universities conspired to restrict financial aid to undergraduates, reported Reuters.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Mayer Brown partner Britt Miller in Chicago, co-leader of the firm’s antitrust practice and a lawyer for defendant Georgetown University, told US District Judge Matthew Kennelly that the defense lawyers had discussed a joint filing seeking dismissal of the claims filed in January.

    Related: New Antitrust Suit Claims Ivy League Schools Colluded To Limit Student Aid

    “We will be as efficient as possible and targeted,” Miller said at a hearing earlier this week in the Northern District of Illinois federal court.

    Miller did not immediately respond to a message on Friday seeking comment about the coordination among defense lawyers and their firms. Other leading defense advocates did not return similar messages.

    Karen Lent, head of the antitrust practice at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, is defending Columbia University. Eric Mahr of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, co-head of the antitrust litigation group, is on the defense team for Massachusetts Institute of Technology. White & Case partner Mark Gidley, leader of the firm’s antitrust group, is representing Vanderbilt University. Among the other schools sued are Yale University, Brown University and Northwestern University.

    In all, the purported class action accuses 17 schools of participating “in a price-fixing cartel that is designed to reduce or eliminate financial aid as a locus of competition.” The schools have denied any wrongdoing.

    The defendant schools are members of the “568 Presidents Group,” an affiliation that says it “works together in an effort to maintain a need-based financial aid system.”

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.