A PYMNTS Company

US: Beer giants up against Canadian brewers in 7th Circuit

By  |  November 4, 2018

According to a report from Courthouse News, the 7th Circuit weighed the reach of US antitrust laws in a case accusing Anheuser-Busch and Molson Coors of making secret deals with Canadian authorities to promote sales of their beer at the expense of small breweries.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Last year, Mountain Crest sued Anheuser-Busch and Molson Coors, America’s first and second largest breweries, claiming they abused their monopoly power to restrain trade – particularly, beer exports to Ontario, Canada.

    Mountain Crest, the 21st largest brewer in the US, brews beer for Ravinder Minhas, a Canadian entrepreneur, for export to Alberta. Since 2009, it’s been trying to expand its market to Ontario, but claims the defendants have stiff-armed it through “secret agreements.”

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Add as Preferred Source

    This secret agreement allegedly stipulated that if any small brewer, like Mountain Crest, wanted to sell 12 or 24-packs of beer in Ontario, they would have to pay listing, handling, and service charges to sell through The Beer Store. Anheuser Busch and Molson Coors brands were exempt from the fees.

    A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit as barred by the act-of-state doctrine, because all the challenged conduct is governed by a contract with the Ontario government.

    But Mountain Crest’s attorney Charles Benoit told a 7th Circuit panel Friday, November 2,  that this interpretation of the law immunizes illegal conduct abroad by American companies.

    “Can a beer company offer $10 million [to a foreign government] to block all other beer sales? The [act-of-state] doctrine cannot be a defense,” Benoit told the three-judge panel. “It’s absurd.”

    He argued, “It is clear the Sherman Act was intended to protect US exporters.”

    Anheuser-Busch controls 45% of the US beer market and 43% of the Canadian market.

    Full Content: Court House News

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.